SUSPENSIONS


1. Title: Evaluation of the effect of different amount of material on the characteristic of a suspension formulation

2. Objective: To study the effect that was produced by using varied amount of Tragacanth on a suspension formulation

3. Introduction:
The suspension dosage form has long been used for poorly soluble active ingredients for various therapeutic indications. Development of stable suspensions over the shelf life of the drug product continues to be a challenge on many fronts. A good understanding of the fundamentals of disperse systems is essential in the development of a suitable pharmaceutical suspension. The development of a suspension dosage form follows a very complicated path.
The selection of the proper excipients (surfactants, viscosity imparting agents etc.) is important. The particle size distribution in the finished drug product dosage form is a critical parameter that significantly impacts the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of the product. Appropriate analytical methodologies and instruments (chromatographs, viscometers, particle size analyzers, etc.) must be utilized to properly characterize the suspension formulation.

4. Apparatus:
Weighing device, 1 weighing boat, 1 mortar and pestle set, 1 plastic bottle 150 mL, 1 measuring cylinder 50 mL  1 measuring cylinder 200 mL 1 pipette 1 mL and pipette bulb,  1 centrifuge tube 15 mL, 1 beaker 100 mL, Coulter counter device, centrifuge device, and viscometer device.

Materials:
Chalk, Tragacanth, Concentrated Peppermint Water, Syrup BP, Double-strength Chloroform water and Distilled water.


5. Procedure
1)      A suspension formulation of Pediatric Chalk Mixture (150 ml) is prepared using those formula :
Chalk
3 g
Tragacanth
Refer Table 1
Concentrated peppermint water
0.6 ml
Syrup BP
15 ml
Double strength chloroform water
75 ml
Distilled water, q.s.
150 ml

Table 1
Pediatric Chalk Mixture
Group
Tragacanth (g)
I
1,5
0.0
II
2,6
0.1
III
3,7
0.3
IV
4,8
0.5

2)    5 ml of suspension that has been formed is poured and labeled into the weighing boat. Discuss and compare the texture, clarity and colour of suspension formed.
3)      Then, poured 50 ml of the suspension into 50 ml measuring cylinder and within 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50 and 60 minutes, the height of the solid phase that sediment into the measuring cylinder being measured.
4)     The balance from the suspension (95 ml) is poured into 100 ml beaker and the viscosity of the suspension is determined using viscometer.
5)      10 ml of the suspension is poured into centrifuge tube and the height of the solid phase is measured. (1000 rpm, 5 minutes, 25 °C).



6. Results:
Height of solid phase that is deposited in the cylinder :
Time (min)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
Height of solid phase (mm)
1113
20
15
13
1111
10
10
10
9
9
9
9
9


Time (min)
Average height of precipitates (mm) (x ±SD)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
Amount of Tragacanth (g)
0.0
113
20
15
13
11
10
10
10
9
9
9
9
9
0.1
88
85
84
83
81
80
79
78
78
78
78
78
78
0,3
120
119
118
117
117
117
116
116
116
116
116
116
116
0.5
120
118
118
118
117
117
117
117
117
117
117
116
116











Viscosity of the suspension :

Tragacanth used is 0.0g (our group)
Readings
1
2
3
4
5
6
Viscosity
0.50
0.50
0.70
0.50
0.00
0.50
Average + SD
0.45 + 0.21







When Tragacanth used is 0.1 g :
Readings
1
2
3
4
5
6
Viscosity
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
Average + SD
0.58 + 0.19







When the Tragacanth used is 0.3g
Readings
1
2
3
4
5
6
Viscosity
2.00
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
Average + SD
1.58 + 0.19







When the Tragacanth used is 0.5g
Readings
1
2
3
4
5
6
Viscosity
2.00
4.50
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.50
Average + SD
3.83 + 0.85







Viscosity of the suspension
Amount of Tragacanth (g)

0.0
0.1
0.3
0.5
Viscosity (cP) (x ±SD)
0.45±0.21
0.58±0.19
1.58±0.19
3.83±0.85






Amount of Tragacanth (g)
Before centrifuged
After
centrifuged
Ratio of heights
0.0
75
15
5
0.1
80
10
8
0.3
80
20
4
0.5
80
4
4













Heights of solid phase after being centrifuged



7. Discussion:

1. Discuss and compare the physical characteristics of the suspension.
For this experiment, the suspension is prepared with or without tragacanth. Tragacanth acts as suspending agent or viscosity enhancer. It will reduce the rate of sedimentation by increasing the viscosity of the suspension. For group 1 and 5, there are no Tragacanth being added into the suspension. So, the suspension will look more watery, it will be easier to sediment and redisperse. The suspension also less viscous, so it will be less cloudy with two layers formed. The colour of the suspension looks white and less milky compare to the others.
For group 2 and 6, only 0.1g of Tragacanth is being added into the suspension. The texture of the suspension looks less viscous and easily redispersed. The colour of the suspension looks milky white. While for group 3 and 7, 0.3g of Tragacanth is added into the suspension. Compared to previous groups, this suspension looks more viscous, but also easily redispersed. The appearance is more opaque and the colour looks milkier. For the last group, group 4 and 8, 0.5g of tragacanth is being added into the suspension. The suspension looks the most viscous and the rate of sedimentation becomes more longer. The colour of the suspension looks the milkiest compared to the suspension of other groups. It is also much more difficult to redisperse.
  
2. Graph of heights of sediment against time. Discuss.




The graph above shows the relationship between the heights of sediment with time and the amount of Tragacanth used. As observed on the graph, it is shows that the graph rapidly decline with time. This is related to the amount of Tragacanth that was used. For this suspension, the amount of Tragacanth used was 0.0 g. Tragacanth acts as emulsifier, stabilizer, and thickening agent for the suspension. Therefore, in the absence of Tragacanth, the suspension form sediment or layers faster than suspension which contain Tragacanth.


3. Plot a graph of height of sediment vs. time for the formulation of suspension that contain varied amount of Tragacanth. Explain.



The graph above shows the relationship between the heights of sediment against the time using a different amount of Tragacanth.  The greater the amount of Tragacanth, the higher the height of sediment. This means that the sediment is well dispersed in the system if the Tragacanth is sufficiently provided. This shows the right characteristic of the suspension which is well dispersed and does not form sediment faster after the suspension is shaked. At 0 amount of Tragacanth which acts as surfactant, the sediment form very faster. This shows that it is not suitable for characteristics of suspension.

4. Describe briefly the mechanism of viscometer. Plot a graph of viscosity vs. weight of Tragacanth. Give explanation.
The mechanism of viscometer analysis involved a motorized cylindrical rotor that is inserted into a sample and rotated at constant speed using rotational viscometer. In this experiment, the sample is placed in beaker. By using suitable metal spindle, it is then rotated in the sample at fixed rpm, and the torque required to rotate the spindle is measured. Based on the internal resistance to a rotation provided by the shear stress of the sample, the sample’s absolute viscosity can be determined. Absolute viscosity is in centipoise (cP), equivalent to mPa.s in SI units. 


             The functions of Tragacanth are as emulsifier, stabilizer and thickening agent. From the graph above, we can see that the viscosity increase with increasing amount of Tragacanth which 0.0 g of Tragacanth having 0.45 cP, 0.1 g having 0.58 cP, 0.3 g having 1.58 cP and 0.5 g having 3.83 cP. This is because Tragacanth, besides acting as suspending agent, it also imparts viscosity to the solution. Suspending agents form film around particle and decrease interparticle attraction. Tragacanth increases the viscosity of the solution, which will prevent sedimentation of the suspended particles.
A good suspension should have well developed thixotropy. Thixotropy is the property of certain gels of becoming fluid when shaken and then becoming semisolid again. At rest the solution is sufficient viscous to prevent sedimentation and thus aggregation or caking of the particles. When agitation is applied the viscosity is reduced and provide good flow characteristic from mouth of the bottle.
Precaution when measuring the viscosity is using the appropriate spindle of the viscometer according to the amount of Tragacanth used so that correct results will be achieved. Besides, the step in making the suspension also must be correct because this will effect the value of the viscosity. Other than that, the weight and amount of each material need to be weighed accurately because this also will affect the results.


5. Plot a graph of height of ratio of sediment as a result of centrifugation vs. weight of Tragacanth. Give explanation.

Weight of Tragacanth (g)
Before Centrifuge
(mm)
After Centrifuge
(mm)
Height Ratio
0.0
75
15
5
0.1
80
10
8
0.3
80
20
4
0.5
80
20
4




Gravity is mainly associated with the slow sedimentation process of an immiscible mixture. A common way to accelerate this sedimentation is by the use of centrifugation, where the high achievable rotation frequencies permit an effective acceleration. The graph showed the height ratio against weight of tragacanth. The amount of Tragacanth used varied in the four formulations. Thus, result in different of height ratio. The Tragacanth is used as a suspending agent where helps in reducing the sedimentation rate of particle in suspension. It works by increasing the viscosity of the liquid vehicle as to support the insoluble particle that are dispersed in a liquid vehicle.
So, from the graph above, it showed the height ratio is decreasing as the weight of Tragacanth increasing. The stability will be measured from the height ratio. The least height ratio will be the most stable suspension amongst others. Based on the graph, suspension contained 0.3g and 0.4g is the most stable and theoretically, suspension that has not contained any Tragacanth would be the least stable. But, graph shows the 0.1 g Tragacanth has the highest height ratio, it might due to some errors occur during the experiment. There are possibilities that the Tragacanth used in the experiment has poor suspending agent properties as compared to others. 

6. What is the function of each material that is used in the suspension formulation? How is the use of different amount of Tragacanth affect the physical characteristic and stability of a suspension formulation?
Chalk is an adsorbent. It functions mainly through adsorption of toxin and other substances that produce diarrhea. Tragacanth is a thickening agent. Tragacanth helps to suspend chalk particles in the suspension, forming a flocculated system. Tragacanth is chosen it has high viscosity at negligible shear and low viscosity at high shear such as shaking, pouring, spreading. Double Strength Chloroform Water is used as a preservative. It has a concentration of 50% as suspension is prone to microbial contamination. Distilled water acts as a vehicle. Concentrated Peppermint Water and Syrup are flavouring agents. Varied amount of Tragacanth will affect the physical characteristic of the suspension, whether the texture is rough or smooth. The stability of suspension that use Tragacanth is good and but on prolonged storage is hard to redisperse. Suspensions that do not use Tragacanth do not have good stability and the solid particles inside will sediment rapidly but it is easily redisperse.

8. Conclusion:
Physical characteristics and stability of a suspension are influenced by the varied amount of Tragacanth. Suspension that does not contain Tragacanth has a rough texture but it is easily redispersed. Sedimentation and deflocculated system occur in the suspension when there is no Tragacanth. Suspension with no Tragacanth is not viscous. Without Tragacanth, the sedimentation height due to centrifugation is high as the suspension is not stable.


9. References:
1.      Aulton, M.E. 2002. Pharmaceutics: The science of dosage form design. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone
2.      Banker, G.S. & Rhodes, C.T. 1990. Modern pharmaceutics. 2nd Ed. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Florence, A.T. & Attwood, D. 1998. Physico-chemical principles of pharmacy. 3rd Ed. New York: Macmillan.

0 comments:

Post a Comment